Sorry ... Jesus Is Not Coming At Any Moment Part 4
Copyright 1994 - 2018 Bill's Bible Basics

Authored By  :
Bill Kochman

Published On :
November 5, 2007

Last Updated :
January 3, 2009

Isaiah 66:8, Israel Has Existed For 4,000 Years, Political
Maneuverings To Create Modern State Of Israel, Jews Lost The
Kingdom Due To Their Rejection Of Christ, A Link Between The
Prophecy Of Isaiah And Christ's "Another Nation" Prophecy?,
Hollow Temple Worship During Isaiah's Time, Prophesied Birth
Of Jesus, Jesus' Birth And Ascension In Revelation, Birth Of
Christian Nation, Jesus Is Firstfruits Of The Resurrection,
Nicodemus And Necessity Of Spiritual Birth, Spiritual Temple
And A Holy Nation, Kingdom Passes From Unbelieving Jews To
Peter And First Century Christian Church, RCC Pope Doctrine,
Jesus Is The Rock And Not Peter, Birth Of The New Nation,
Christ's Resurrection, An Earthquake And Centurion's Remark,
Surprise And Astonishment - Isaiah's Prophecy Is Fulfilled,
Spiritual Christian Nation Born "In One Day" And "At Once",
God Will Complete The Full Number Of Resurrected Souls

In part three, I shared the following verse with you from the
Book of Isaiah. This verse has been widely used by pro-Israel
American preachers and the Jews themselves, to try to justify
and add legitimacy to, the political "creation" of the nation
of Israel on May 14, 1948:

"Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things?
Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall
a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she
brought forth her children."
Isaiah 66:8, KJV

We have already seen that the prophecies which have been
used to explain the return of the Jews to the land of Israel
since the twentieth century, have, in my view, been grossly
misinterpreted. Is it possible that the meaning of the above
verse has also been distorted in order to support a wayward
doctrine? Again, I suspect that it has.

To begin, I do not believe that the nation of Israel can be
born in our modern times, "in one day", or "at once", due to
the fact that, according to the Biblical record, Israel has
in fact existed for over four thousand years. As I explained
before, it began with the birth of Jacob and his twelve sons.
While it's true that Israel has been repeatedly attacked and
dominated many times during this lengthy period of time, and
even temporarily lost its national identity at times, such
as when the Roman Empire renamed it Palestine, nevertheless,
the Jewish nation, whether scattered, or bound together into
one cohesive form, has existed; and I am sure that many Jews
will know exactly what I mean by this. Nationhood isn't just
a matter of being at one physical place at the same time. It
is also a matter of personal identity, tradition and belief.

Furthermore, in the real sense of the word, the nation state
that we know as Israel today did NOT become a nation "in one
day", or even "at once", as the prophecy states. It may have
been declared a nation to the world on a particular day, just
as the foreign colonial powers created and carved out quite a
few nations in decades past; particularly in the Middle East
and Asia, with just the stroke of their pen; but in reality,
the 1948 announcement by the World Jewish Congress was the
result of political maneuverings which had been going on for
literally decades. In short, this event did not occur "in one
day", or "at once"; therefore, I am not fully convinced that
it really meets the requirements of the prophecy. Isaiah's
prophecy is describing something truly unique which creates
astonishment for the observer of the event.

Concerning the events of 1948, I again suggest that you read
the "The Seven Heads" series, and/or conduct online research
of your own regarding the British Mandate, Europe's attitude
toward the Jews during that time period, as well as the 1917
Balfour Declaration. You'll learn that the Europeans wanted
the Jews to leave Europe; and thus, they had to politically
create a place for them to go. The atrocities committed by
Hitler only strengthened the resolve of the European powers
to achieve their goal, and they may have acted partially out
of guilt. But the point I wish to emphasize here is that the
process to carve out a home for the Jews did not occur "in
one day", or "at once"; it took decades to complete; and to
my knowledge, such a slow development would not result in
surprise or astonishment, as the prophecy seems to indicate.
European politicians were fully aware of what was happening,
as were the other major world powers of the day.

Another reason why I have difficulty accepting the argument
that the verse in Isaiah is a prophecy regarding the "birth"
of Israel in May of 1948, is because, as I explained in part
three, Jesus very clearly stated that the Jews had forfeited
their rights to the Kingdom, due to their unbelief. In fact,
you may recall that the Lord very specifically said that it
would be given to ANOTHER nation; and that is the key which
will help us to unlock this mystery. The Lord said:

". . . Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which
the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the
corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in
our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall
be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the
fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall
be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind
him to powder."
Matthew 21:42b-44, KJV

So here we have Jesus clearly stating that another nation is
going to be given the Kingdom; and we also have Isaiah saying
that a nation will be born "in a day", and "at once". He also
conveys the idea that the birth of this nation will come as
a surprise. Thus he writes "Who hath heard such a thing? who
hath seen such things?". This attitude cannot possibly refer
to the 1948 declaration; because as we have already seen, it
was no mystery that the Europeans had been working on plans
to create a homeland for the Jews for decades. Is it possible
that what Isaiah is saying, and what Jesus is saying, are in
some way related. I suspect as much. So who is this nation?

To better understand what Isaiah is talking about, and to put
the verse in its proper context, all we have to do is to read
some of the previous verses in that chapter. Once we do that,
we discover that just as God was sick and tired of the Jews,
and their hypocritical, dead temple worship during the First
Century, (as we discussed earlier), He was equally tired of
the Jews and their hollow temple worship during Isaiah's time
as well. This was some one hundred and fifty years before the
Babylonian invasions, and even before the Assyrian invasions.
Isaiah was in fact sent to warn the Israelites of the coming
chastisement by the hand of the Assyrians. At any rate, the
beginning of the chapter clearly reveals God's attitude:

"Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne, and the earth
is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me?
and where is the place of my rest? For all those things hath
mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the
LORD: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor
and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word. He that
killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a
lamb, as if he cut off a dog’s neck; he that offereth an
oblation, as if he offered swine’s blood; he that burneth
incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen
their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their
abominations. I also will choose their delusions, and will
bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did
answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil
before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not."
Isaiah 66:1-4, KJV

So, as you can plainly see, the Lord was utterly fed up with
their false spirituality, and even with their temple, which
King Solomon had built centuries earlier. The Jews had become
totally absorbed in their traditions. They were going through
the motion of being holy and righteous, but they had lost the
Spirit. How much this sounds like so many modern churches in
America. As a result, God decided to do something new. After
expressing His anger with the Jews, in the seventh and eighth
verses He tells us exactly what He is going to do about it:

"Before she travailed, she brought forth; before her pain
came, she was delivered of a man child. Who hath heard such
a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made
to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at
once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her
Isaiah 66:7-8, KJV

In these verses, "Zion" refers to Jerusalem, or in a larger
sense, to Israel as a whole. If we just read verse eight by
itself, we can be tricked into believing that it is talking
about Israel becoming a nation on May 14, 1948; which is what
some of these preachers, (and certain Jews), want us to see.
However, if we take the time to read verses seven and eight
together, as we really should, suddenly, the verses takes on
an entirely new, and wonderful, meaning.

In short, the Lord seems to be saying that because the Jews
have become so sidetracked in a spiritual sense, and are only
interested in their temple worship and their vain traditions,
(just as Jesus would tell them centuries later), He is going
to do something new. We are informed that a man child will be
born; in other words, a son. Isaiah appears to be describing
a very unique, miraculous birth. Notice that he says that the
child will be born before the woman travails, and before her
pain comes. In other words, it sounds as if this woman will
give birth without experiencing labor pains. Are you starting
to grasp what is actually being said here? Do you understand
what this prophecy is really all about? It is much more than
the concocted "birth" of Israel in 1948.

In verse eight, it is translated as "for as soon as Zion
travailed, she brought forth her children." Actually, in my
view, this is an important mistranslation; because the word
"children" is translated from the Hebrew word "ben". As the
Hebrew lexicon clearly proves, "ben" shouldn't be translated
as "children"; it should be translated as "son":

----- Begin Quote -----

ben bane

1) son, grandson, child, member of a group
1a) son, male child
1b) grandson
1c) children (pl. - male and female)
1d) youth, young men (pl.)
1e) young (of animals)
1f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice
[for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]
1g) people (of a nation) (pl.)
1h) of lifeless things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.)
1i) a member of a guild, order, class
----- End Quote -----

As you can plainly see, "son", or "male child", is clearly
the primary meaning of the Hebrew word "ben"; thus, those
two verses together should be read as:

"Before she travailed, she brought forth; before her pain
came, she was delivered of a man child. Who hath heard such
a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made
to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at
once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her
Isaiah 66:7-8, KJV

As soon as I read those two verses together, my eyes nearly
popped out of my head, because I was immediately reminded of
very similar phraseology in the Book of Revelation. Consider
the following verses:

"And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman
clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon
her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child
cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. And
there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great
red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven
crowns upon his heads. And his tail drew the third part of
the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the
dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be
delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all
nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto
God, and to his throne."
Revelation 12:1-5, KJV

As I have explained before, the above Scriptures are widely
believed to be discussing Jesus' birth in Israel, as well as
His subsequent Ascension to Heaven following His Crucifixion
and Resurrection from the dead. Notice how the woman wears a
crown of twelve stars. This may represent the Twelve Tribes
of Israel, or perhaps the Twelve Apostles, who represent the
leadership of the New Nation that was founded upon Christ's
blood. Please notice the similarities between the verses in
Isaiah, and these verses in the Book of Revelation. In both
instances, we have Jerusalem or Israel being described as a
woman in travail; that is, in labor, who then brings forth a
son. The verses in Isaiah, when read together, make it clear
in my mind, that this son is directly linked to the birth of
the prophesied nation. In fact, he seems to be responsible
for its very birth.

It should be clear to you by now that I'm not referring to a
physically-recognized, political nation with earthly borders
like Israel, but rather to a global, spiritual, eternal one,
that is comprised of all Christian believers everywhere, and
for all time.

Based upon these verses, and others I will be sharing with
you momentarily, I am convinced that this is what Jesus was
talking about when He told the Jewish spiritual leaders that
the Kingdom would be taken from them, and given to another
nation. As we saw earlier, He very clearly told them that the
cornerstone which they had rejected, (meaning Himself), would
become the foundation stone for His new nation; which as we
now know, would be born once He died and rose from the dead.

I am convinced that this is the man child, or son, as well as
the nation which would be born "at once", or "in a day", just
as Isaiah had prophesied. This nation perfectly meets all of
the requirements set by Isaiah's prophecy, because it had in
fact never existed before, unlike the nation of Israel which
had already existed for several thousand years.

The reason why I'm so convinced that this nation didn't exist
prior to Christ's Sacrifice and Resurrection, is because the
Bible very plainly tells us, as I have explained before, that
Jesus Christ is the very first member of this new spiritual
nation, and it couldn't possibly have existed until Jesus did
what He did for us. The Scriptures tell us that Jesus is the
first begotten of the dead, the firstborn and the firstfruits
of the Resurrection, as we see here:

"For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth
in pain together until now. And not only they, but ourselves
also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we
ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption,
to wit, the redemption of our body . . . For whom he did
foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the
image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many
Romans 8:22-23, 29, KJV

"If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all
men most miserable. But now is Christ risen from the dead,
and become the firstfruits of them that slept. For since by
man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the
dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be
made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the
firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his
1 Corinthians 15:19-23, KJV

"Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to
be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: Who
hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath
translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: In whom we
have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of
sins: Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn
of every creature: . . . And he is the head of the body, the
church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead;
that in all things he might have the preeminence."
Colossians 1:12-15, 18, KJV

"To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which
are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to
the spirits of just men made perfect,"
Hebrews 12:23, KJV

"Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we
should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures."
James 1:18, KJV

"And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the
first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of
the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our
sins in his own blood,"
Revelation 1:5, KJV

"These are they which were not defiled with women; for they
are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb
whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men,
being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb."
Revelation 14:4, KJV

Jesus also made it very plain in His conversation with the
Pharisee Nicodemus, that in order to become members of this
new spiritual nation, we must be born of water, (meaning a
physical birth in the womb, as Nicodemus understood), and of
the Spirit, through our faith in Christ. Consider the Lord's
words to Nicodemus:

"Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say
unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the
kingdom of God. Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be
born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his
mother’s womb, and be born? Jesus answered, Verily, verily,
I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the
Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which
is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the
Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must
be born again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou
hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it
cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born
of the Spirit."
John 3:3-8, KJV

There is further proof that the nation of which both Isaiah
and Jesus spoke is really the spiritual nation of worldwide
believers in Jesus Christ. Please consider what the Apostle
Peter wrote to the First Century Christian brethren. Peter
makes it very plain that Jesus Christ, (the Cornerstone who
was rejected by the Jewish Elders, as per the Old Testament
prophecies), is the founder of our spiritual temple. He also
explains that not only are we symbolic living stones in the
Lord's Temple, but we are also a Holy Nation. Peter wrote:

"To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed
of men, but chosen of God, and precious, Ye also, as lively
stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood,
to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus
Christ. Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture,
Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious:
and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto
you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them
which be disobedient, the stone which the builders
disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, And a
stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them
which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also
they were appointed. But ye are a chosen generation, a royal
priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye
should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out
of darkness into his marvellous light: Which in time past
were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had
not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy."
1 Peter 2:4-10, KJV

As we've already seen, Jesus clearly stated that the Kingdom
would be taken from the unbelieving Jews who rejected Him,
and would be given to another more worthy nation; i.e., to a
nation of believers in Christ Jesus, who truly demonstrate
the fruits of repentance. Is there any additional Scriptural
evidence which mentions this transfer of power and spiritual
anointing and authority? There most certainly is; and it is
directly tied to the previous verses written by Peter. The
reason why Peter could write with such authority, is because
Jesus Himself gave Peter this authority, as becomes evident
by the following verses found in the Gospel of Matthew:

"And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the
Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him,
Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath
not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this
rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not
prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of
the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on
earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt
loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
Matthew 16:16-19, KJV

In spite of his own shortcomings, (his cowardice, and his
own betrayal of Christ, for example), Peter firmly believed
that Jesus was the long-prophesied Messiah, the Christ, and
Jesus obviously recognized this quality in Peter. Thus, the
Lord chose Peter to lead the followers of the fledging First
Century Church, once He had returned to His Father in Heaven.
However, please realize that while the Lord gave Peter this
special blessing, this is a far cry from the Roman Catholic
doctrine which promotes the false belief that Peter was the
first Bishop of Rome, and thus, the first Pope. As you may
know, the Roman Catholic Church uses this false doctrine to
try to validate their supposed spiritual superiority, and
authority, over other Christian churches.

As I have pointed out before, while Jesus gave Peter certain
authority, the Gospels, as well as the Book of the Acts of
the Apostles, seem to indicate that Peter may not have fully
embraced it. These books suggest that leadership within the
First Century Church was shared by Peter, James and John, and
later by Paul as well. It's also important to realize that in
the previous verses, the Lord is referring to Himself when He
states "upon this rock I will build my church". I don't share
the opinion that Jesus is calling Peter the rock, even though
Jesus did name him Cephas, meaning "a rock". Peter seems to
confirm that Jesus was referring to Himself as the Rock, in
the verses I shared earlier, where Peter refers to Jesus as
the Cornerstone. The Apostle Paul likewise states:

"And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank
of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was
1 Corinthians 10:4, KJV

So while Peter may have been nicknamed Cephas by Jesus, the
Lord is the only true Rock, as well as the only High Priest,
of our Christian faith.

But the main point that I wish for you to grasp, is that the
Jews did in fact lose the Kingdom, precisely as Jesus stated
that they would, as a result of their unbelief. Furthermore,
this Kingdom was given to a new spiritual nation, comprised
of believers in Jesus Christ. The birth of our new nation is
directly linked to the birth of the man child, Jesus Christ,
precisely as Isaiah had prophesied in the two Scriptures we
examined earlier. You may recall that Isaiah seems to convey
the idea that the birth of this nation would be accompanied
by a certain degree of surprise and astonishment. It would
be something unique and out of the ordinary.

Exactly when this new nation was born is a matter of personal
conjecture. Whether we establish it as the moment that Jesus
died on the Cross, or three days later when He rose from the
dead, one thing is absolutely certain: If we stop to examine
the events which transpired during that entire period, and
the things that were said by some of the participants, it is
obvious that there was plenty of surprise, astonishment, and
fear going around. Consider the following verses that we find
in Matthew chapter twenty-seven:

"Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded
up the ghost. And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent
in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did
quake, and the rocks rent; And the graves were opened; and
many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of
the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy
city, and appeared unto many. Now when the centurion, and
they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake,
and those things that were done, they feared greatly,
saying, Truly this was the Son of God."
Matthew 27:50-54, KJV

One problem with reading the Bible, is that sometimes it can
be difficult to recognize when time gaps exist between some
of the events. At first glance, one might erroneously assume
that the events described in the previous verses all occurred
shortly after Jesus died on the Cross; however, it seems to
me that a careful reading of the above verses indicates that
Matthew is describing things which occurred, not right after
Jesus died on the Cross, but rather three days later when He
miraculously rose from the dead.

In other words, contrary to what we see in certain Hollywood
movies, the centurion did not say "Truly this was the Son of
God" as he gazed upon Jesus dying on the Cross. The soldiers
were undoubtedly desensitized, having already witnessed many
such crucifixions of criminals. Jesus' Crucifixion was just
another one and a part of their job. Jesus did nothing while
hanging on the Cross, which would give the centurion reason
to make such a remark. However, the remark makes more sense
if we realize that it was said three days later when a great
earthquake occurred, and Jesus rose from the dead. When it
states that they were "watching Jesus", it doesn't mean that
they were watching Him die on the Cross; it means that they
were watching His grave, as they had been instructed to do
by the unbelieving Jewish Elders, who feared that the Lord
might actually rise from the dead, as we see here:

"Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation,
the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,
Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he
was yet alive, After three days I will rise again. Command
therefore that the sepulchre be made sure until the third
day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away,
and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead: so the
last error shall be worse than the first. Pilate said unto
them, Ye have a watch: go your way, make it as sure as ye
can. So they went, and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the
stone, and setting a watch."
Matthew 27:62-66, KJV

So consider the facts which surrounded the birth of this new
nation. We have a great earthquake which must have surprised
and unsettled a lot of people, and caused them to fear. We
can also easily imagine the shock and horror that the Jewish
religious leaders must have felt after having gone through a
great earthquake, and then discovering that the temple veil
had been fully ripped from top to bottom, possibly revealing
the Holy of Holies, which was the holiest part of the temple,
where the Ark of the Covenant had been formerly placed. Maybe
they realized that it was a sign from God, that their days as
the spiritual leaders of Israel were numbered. As we saw in
part two, Caiaphas certainly seemed aware of the danger. Then
we have these hardened soldiers witnessing the Resurrection
of Jesus Christ. Matthew tells us that "they feared greatly"
having been observers of these events. As if the Lord's own
Resurrection wasn't enough, it isn't difficult to imagine the
astonishment, shock and fear which must have permeated all of
Jerusalem, as her inhabitants found themselves being visited
by many of the Old Testament saints.

In light of these events, and the people's reactions to them,
it makes perfect sense that God would inspire Isaiah to write
"Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things?". By
comparison, in my opinion, the political events of 1948 don't
even come close in magnitude, and certainly do not warrant
this kind of a statement from the Prophet Isaiah.

Clearly then, the prophesied birth of this new nation was
fulfilled to the letter. It was fulfilled "in one day", and
"at once", precisely at the moment that Jesus rose from the
dead, followed by all of the other Old Testament saints. It
resulted in such shock and awe as this world has never seen
before, and won't see again, until Jesus returns. As we saw
earlier, Jesus became the first begotten of the dead, and
the founder of our New Nation, as described by Peter. Jesus
is the firstborn, and the firstfruits of the Resurrection,
and all of the Old Testament Saints who followed Him out of
the grave are the very first inhabitants of this New Nation;
and some day, we will follow them into Glory; for as we are
told at the end of the Epistle to the Hebrews:

"God having provided some better thing for us, that they
without us should not be made perfect."
Hebrews 11:40, KJV

That word "perfect" does not mean what you think it means.
According to the original Greek word used there, "teleioo",
it really means that their numbers won't be complete, until
we have all likewise been resurrected as well. God's eternal
Plan of Redemption extends from the first page of Genesis,
to the final page of the Book of Revelation. Everyone who is
predestinated to be saved and resurrected, will be, in God's
perfect time, and absolutely nothing will hinder His plans.

This series is concluded in part five. I trust that you will
join me.

⇒ Go To The Next Part . . .

BBB Tools And Services

Please avail yourself of other areas of the Bill's Bible Basics website. There are many treasures for you to discover.